Main Views
QA Views
About Transvision
BETA
Displaying 1 result:
Entity | en | cy |
---|---|---|
Entity
#
all locales
mozilla_org • en • firefox • browsers • compare • opera.ftl compare-opera-in-terms-of-head-to-head-utility |
en
In terms of head to head utility, { -brand-name-opera } and { -brand-name-firefox } are close competitors. { -brand-name-opera } may have an advantage in one aspect with its compatibility with and access to { -brand-name-chrome }’s huge extension library. But one significant factor to consider is the fact that { -brand-name-opera }, because it’s built on { -brand-name-chromium }, is a processor-hungry browser with its RAM consumption comparable to { -brand-name-chrome }, which is known for its high CPU usage.
|
cy
O ran cymharu gwasanaethau, mae { -brand-name-opera } a { -brand-name-firefox } yn gystadleuwyr agos. Efallai bod gan { -brand-name-opera } fantais mewn un agwedd gyda’i gydnawsedd â chasgliad estyniadau enfawr { -brand-name-chrome } a’i fynediad iddo. Ond un ffactor arwyddocaol i'w ystyried yw'r ffaith bod { -brand-name-opera }, oherwydd ei fod wedi'i adeiladu ar { -brand-name-chromium }, yn borwr sy'n drwm ar y proseswr gyda'i ddefnydd RAM yn debyg i { -brand-name-chrome }, sy'n adnabyddus am ei ddefnydd uchel o'r CPU.
|
APIThese results are also available as an API request to search in
en or
cy.
Learn more about the Transvision API.
Please enable JavaScript. Some features won't be available without it.